Archive

Archive for the ‘Spiritual Discipline’ Category

Just For Men?

February 9, 2012 1 comment

Rant follows…. you’ve been warned!

Mark Driscoll says marriage is about women giving men what they “need”. None of this wimpy “Submit to one another as unto the Lord” stuff for Driscoll. Where would you read that kind of garbage, anyway? Oh, yeah…. (Ephesians 5:21)

(While Driscoll’s vision might sound fun for a while, I want a partner to share all of life with, not merely an eternal sex slave.)

John Piper says that Christianity is mostly masculine. So forget all that garbage about God gathering us under God’s wings like a mother bird. Who made that image up anyway? Oh, yeah…. (Matthew 23:37)

Why do I single these thoughts out? Because these men present themselves as important speakers and writers. Because too many innocent people will find their books in stores and assume the authors write with Biblical authority. Because these men are “conservative” (whatever that means), many will never question anything they say or write.

Where in the scriptures are women second-class citizens? Is real grace only available for “he-men”, macho jock-types, and not for male artists, musicians, poets, and dreamers?

I hope this seems like a silly debate to you. The problem is that too many are falling for this garbage because it’s the current “in” thing. (“Itching ears” anyone?)

Our church (Memorial Baptist, Columbus, Indiana) and our denomination (the American Baptist Churches in the USA) are blessed through many women with leadership gifts. I’m proud to say that I’ve learned much from the women God has placed in my life. (I’ll put Molly Marshall, president of Central Baptist Theological Seminary, up against any theologian or preacher any where any time. Period.)

When will we realize we’re missing out on the movement of God’s Spirit by insisting on limiting that movement to men? (Or white men? Or educated men? Or rich men? Or…….??)

Heaven, Hell, and Rob Bell

October 12, 2011 Leave a comment

It seems impossible to avoid the controversy stirred by reactions to Rob Bell’s latest book, Love Wins. Notice my careful (for once) choice of wording: the controversy that’s been getting attention has been stirred by reactions to the book. We’ve done Rob Bell a great disservice by not engaging the questions he is raising.

Bell wants us to address one of the oldest questions of evangelical theology: How can a loving God send people to hell? This can only be fully explored by asking “What is the nature of the salvation Jesus proclaimed? What is the nature of sin? What is the nature of God’s love for us?” The controversy has been over “Does Rob Bell believe in hell?” and “Is Rob Bell a universalist?” Sadly, commentators have focused so much on the latter questions that we’ve yet again avoided the former, essential questions.

Bell’s detractors are right on one point: it’s quite difficult to discern from Love Wins what Bell actually believes about hell. To Bell’s credit, he never says that this is a book of systematic theology. It’s a book about God’s desire for each of us, a desire rooted in the unconditional love God has for all persons. God already loves each of us, and nothing we ever do (or don’t do) will change that!

(By the way, who picks up a Rob Bell book or video for an exposition of systematic theology? Bell is first and foremost a story-teller, and he relies heavily on those skills in Love Wins. Systematic theology comes from philosophers and academicians. Bell never claims to be presenting a formal theological system.)

Bell and his publisher can be faulted for not addressing anticipated reactions to this book. Given the potential for misunderstanding his intentions and/or conclusions, I would’ve appreciated at least a chapter with some formal statements to reduce chances for confusion. Readers who aren’t accustomed to a story-telling format could be too easily swayed by Bell’s detractors into missing his points.
For me, Bell’s conclusion is that God wants nothing more in the whole universe than to love each one of us. We can either decide to come home to God or we can choose to refuse God’s love. Salvation isn’t about religious formalities and rituals, but about a restored relationship. This is much deeper and much more significant than merely “getting into heaven.”

One cannot understand Bell’s argument without taking note of his choice of a Biblical narrative framework, that of the older son in the story of the lost sons (Luke 15:25-32). The younger son, who by every religious guideline should have been condemned to hell, turns away from his rejection of his father and comes back home. The older son refuses to take part in the celebration for his brother. We can tell from the older son’s comments that, even though he never geographically left home, he had also rejected their father’s love. The father left the invitation open for the older son; the choice was his.

The story of the lost sons has no end. What did the older son ultimately do? Jesus was speaking to religious leaders who were rejecting his message of love and reconciliation (Luke 15:1-2). Were they too in danger of choosing to stand outside the party, choosing self and hell over God’s unconditional love? What did they ultimately do? What will we ultimately do?

My thoughts now (so don’t blame Bell for what follows):

We tend to limit salvation to “what do you believe with your head about Jesus?” There’s gotta be more to it that this. If that’s all there is to salvation, then what was the point of the cross and resurrection? What was the point of incarnation? We insult the life-transforming Good News of Jesus when we water it down to a few points of dogma.

Is salvation really about surrendering all of life to the radical love of God? Can one really say “Yes” to God’s radical love without being transformed by that same love?

What if God chooses to welcome home some (or even many) who have not formally assented to the religion we have created around Jesus but have responded to God’s love? What if some who have formally assented to the religion we have created around Jesus choose to stand outside the celebration, refusing to be transformed by the love of God?

I’m not saying at all that we come to God on our own terms, according to whatever religious system (or lack thereof) we prefer. I am saying that God is not limited to the framework of our own favorite religious system. Hell is about rejecting God’s love, not about rejecting a religious system.

Psalm 84:10 (NRSV) says, “I would rather be a doorkeeper in the house of my God than live in the tents of wickedness.” Many of us want to be “bouncers” in the house of God, choosing who gets in and who doesn’t. That’s not what a doorkeeper at the temple (the house of God) did. The doorkeeper kept things ready for worship, making sure all the supplies and tools were ready. The doorkeeper also made sure the people were ready for honoring God. The doorkeepers facilitated worship, helping the people come to God.

How can we, those who live our lives after the teachings and example of Jesus, help connect people to this live-giving, life-transforming love of God as revealed in Jesus? This is what should be driving us as God’s church.

Next up: Francis Chan disappointingly misses the point.

Using My Bible for Spiritual Formation – Questions to Ask

July 6, 2010 Leave a comment

A couple of Sunday nights ago I presented these questions as ways to use the Bible for spiritual formation. This is quite different from using the Bible to "defend the faith" or trying to prove the Bible’s historical and scientific truthfulness. These questions will help us get at what God is saying to us here and now through the scriptures, with a focus on making my everyday life reflect Jesus better every day.

1. PRAY! OK, that’s not a question, but no serious use of the scriptures can begin without an openness to God’s Spirit as we read, study, and meditate. Pray for "ears to hear" what God is saying. And remember that prayer is primarily about us opening up to the life-changing work of God’s Spirit, not us getting what we want from God.

2. How did the original audience understand this passage? Historical events, cultural habits, and common imagery of the language would all have had an impact on how the first hearers (notice I didn’t say "readers") would have understood this. A warning: never let understanding the historical, cultural, or linguistic background of the scriptures be the goal of study. It is an important tool, but no substitute for listening to God through the scriptures.

3. What was God saying to the original audiences? This is a dual question– what was God saying to the people involved in the passage, and what was God saying to the people who first heard the stories told? Listen for core principles that can serve as foundations for Christ-like living.

4. Why did God say that? For example, many of the prohibitions in the Law of Moses that seem a bit excessive to us were addressing the religious practices of the Canaanites (especially the sexual warnings). Most of Israel’s neighbors sought to manipulate (or at least convince) their gods to do what they people wanted. Israel was to trust that God is looking out for them, and that God will guide them and provide for their needs. Again, listen for core principles that can serve as foundations for Christ-like living.

5. How does what God said back then translate into my world now? Is there a similar situation this applies to? How do the core principles from this passage apply to other situations?

6. What is God saying to me now? Is God calling me to a particular task? To abandon a sinful habit or attitude? To what is God calling me? There’s no "if" here; God is calling each of us to something, to serve God and others, and to live more like Jesus.

7. The most important question: What am I going to do about what God is saying to me now? All of this is a useless exercise unless I act upon God’s call (James 1:22-25).

I’m sure there are questions that could be added to this list. These are the questions I use in preparing Bible studies and sermons, and I present them as merely a starting point for discussion.

Using My Bible More Effectively: Stories and Poems

July 1, 2010 Leave a comment

The Bible is a collection of stories and poems that grew out of the interaction between God and humanity. The Bible is the story of the relationships between God and people, and of the relationships among God’s people. (Even all those "thou shalt nots" of the books of Moses were given to help the Hebrews live out their relationship with God as God’s covenant people.)

This makes the Bible different from a "technical manual" such as we would use to work on a car or computer, and different from a "set of instructions" like a recipe. The Bible’s stories and poems help us see into the character of God, and help us see who we are in light of who God is.

The ancient world had a very different view of history and authorship than we do. We look for technical journalistic precision in reporting events, and a clear "paper trail" connecting exact quotes to their original speakers or writers. The scriptures come out of a very different world. Instead of merely reporting events and quotations, the scriptures seek to interpret those events and sayings to help us in our lives with God. The value of the scriptures lies in their ability through ancient voices to help us hear the voice of God’s Spirit today.

Therefore, interpreting the scriptures involves going beyond history and culture to listen to the voice of God’s Spirit (2 Peter 1:19-21). Historical and cultural facts help enlighten the listening process, but historical and cultural knowledge is not the goal of Bible reading. The purpose of the scriptures is transforming our lives into lives that reflect the character of God as revealed in Jesus (Romans 12:1-2, 2 Timothy 3:14-17).

Next post: questions I use in reading the scriptures for spiritual formation.

Using My Bible More Effectively

June 29, 2010 3 comments

On Sunday nights, I have begun a teaching series on Using Your Bible More Effectively. (Can you call it a “series” when we’re out most of the next month?) We started last night (June 27) with an overview, and will continue on July 25 with a deeper look at the Old Testament.

We are going to focus on using the Bible as a tool for personal spiritual formation, rather than on using the Bible as a tool for defending the faith, or trying to prove that the Bible is scientifically and historically reliable. (Using “My” Bible rather than Using “The” Bible.)

Why this particular focus? Because I believe that the Bible’s own job description says that God gave us the scriptures to help us move toward God, to make us more like Jesus, and to prepare us for living out God’s calling in our lives. (2 Timothy 3:14-17).

Let’s start with how the scriptures came to us. 2 Kings 22 records the discovery of a scroll in the Temple at Jerusalem during Temple renovations. We find almost no record of a written scripture before this time. In fact, we have almost no mention of the Law of Moses being kept after the time of Joshua. There is no mention of Passover in the books of Judges, Samuel, or Kings until this point.

Why is this important for studying the written scriptures? It tells me that the Bible didn’t come to us as “golden tablets” mysteriously appearing in their complete form, nor were the scriptures dictated with exact wordings. The scriptures were born out of the interaction between God and God’s people, out of the movement of God’s Holy Spirit among humanity. The Bible was given to us over centuries of time as a signpost pointing the way to God.

If the Bible came to us out of the activity of God’s Spirit among humanity, then that is also how it must be interpreted (2 Peter 1:19-21) . God’s Holy Spirit guides our interpretation of the scriptures to help us discern what God is saying to our world.

I am convinced that God is speaking to our world, and that the scriptures are an important part of that process.

I hope to expand upon these ideas in the next few blog posts. Questions and/or suggestions are always welcome.

Faith and Pleasing God

March 10, 2010 Leave a comment

Renee Johnson posts a brief daily devotion designed for 20-somethings on her web site and on Twitter. She’s collected some of them in a new book, Faithbook of Jesus.

She recently tweeted (is that a verb?) about struggling with Hebrews 11:6– “No one can please God without faith…” (GNT/TEV).

Here’s my response to her (with my apologies if it’s not addressing the real question she was asking):

“Not sure this is what you wanted when you tweeted about struggling with this passage, but here’s my two (or more) cents….

The letter (probably sermon) we know as Hebrews was written to a congregation of Christian Jews who were struggling with pressure to reject Jesus and return to the Law of Moses. The author goes to great lengths to show that in every way imaginable Jesus is superior to Law.

His point in chapter 11 seems to be that works (sacrifices, commandment-keeping, etc.) without faith are not pleasing to God because works (no matter how good) have never been the basis for our relationship with God. All the way back to the very beginning, human relationships with God are faith-relationships. If Abraham’s and Moses’ relationships with God were based on “by grace, through faith”, then how much more should ours be?

I don’t see this is a warning to “have faith or else” but a powerful, freeing reminder that my relationship with God isn’t based on how well I keep commandments. God loves me and wants me to trust him, and that’s the basis of the life of grace.

Keep up the good writing and thinking!”

And to expand: human relationships with God have NEVER been based on commandment-keeping. I consider this a good thing. If that had been true, then any little infraction would immediately condemn us for all eternity. Even after having sins forgiven by Jesus, any little infraction, even as small as driving 56 in a 55, would condemn us all over again.

That’s NOT how God works. God is in the relationship business, and eagerly wants to build a relationship with you. That’s what the whole story of incarnation is about. Jesus came to rebuild the broken relationships between us and God.

Life is not about spending every moment worrying about sin. God made life to be an ongoing celebration of grace. Instead of focusing on self and sin, put that energy toward seeking God and his guidance. Let God take care of the sin problem for you. Only then can we truly discover who God created us to be and what God created life to be.

I Need Lent

February 23, 2010 Leave a comment

Why do I “like” Lent? Because I know I need Lent. Not only am I in need of constant renewal from God’s Spirit, I also know that I am not so good about scheduling time with God.
I’m not talking about daily devotional time, daily prayer time, or something like that. I’m not so good about blocking out a whole day, or at least several hours, just to listen to God. I can’t hear God’s voice as well when I’m surrounded by dozens of other voices screaming out for attention.
Lent is a powerful reminder that we must be intentional about our relationship with God or other voices will take precedent. Use this season to set aside intentional time for God. Start “small”, maybe a half-hour or so. Tell God everything that’s going on, good and bad, but spend most of your time listening.
And I’m going to do the same right now!

WOW!

February 12, 2010 1 comment

While trying to figure out what I should be doing after this morning’s men’s breakfast, I was driving around town when I turned east onto Eighth Street off Central Avenue…..

WOW!

The trees lining the street were covered in a mix of snow and frost, perfectly absorbing the pastels of a sunrise filtered by fog from the layer of snow covering the ground…. gentle pinks and purples that took on solid form on the trees…..

God had fun with the crayon box this morning.

Though the colors will be quite different later, I highly recommend driving down Eighth Street behind the church, then around the cemetery, and down Marr by East High School and Clifty Park.

Then read Psalm 8.

Me & Jesus (Ain’t Worship)

February 10, 2010 Leave a comment

More thoughts inspired by A. W. Tozer (see previous post; again, thanks to Anne Jackson) on whether worship is merely noise in God’s ears…

A while back (which, being translated, means I’m getting old) there was a semi-popular song “Me and Jesus”:

“Me and Jesus, we got a good thing goin’; Me and Jesus, we got it all worked out….”

Sounds good, right? It’s very Baptist-sounding, right? I can worship God (or serve or whatever) just fine by myself. Right???

Nope. I don’t see any evidence of this in scripture. In fact, I see the opposite. The writer of Hebrews strongly encouraged his/her audience to continue meeting together, in spite of trends away from community. (Hebrews 10:25) Most of the letters to the early church in the New Testament address how to live together as God’s community of faith, as God’s family.

In fact, the togetherness and community of the early church was its most powerful witness to the outside world. The world knew something was real about what the church was preaching because they saw how the church cared for one another and grew together as community. (Acts 2:42-47. Bookmark it– I will refer there often!)

I’m not saying we cannot worship on our own apart from established church services. I am saying that if we do not nurture our connection with Christian community, we weaken our connection with God and actually cannot worship (or serve or anything else) as well.

We were not created to live alone (Genesis 2:18). We were created to live in community; one could even say that community was created for our benefit. Coming together to celebrate Christ in worship energizes our personal prayer and worship, as well as our service and our study and, well, everything we do as we follow Christ TOGETHER!

So, while it’s not grammatically correct, can we start living and singing “We and Jesus…”?

Noise, Noise, Noise…

February 9, 2010 Leave a comment

Writer, blogger, and tweeter Anne Jackson posted this quote on Twitter this morning:

“Religious noise and worship do not necessarily mean the same thing.” AW Tozer (The Purpose of Man)

(Perfect timing after a sermon on worship, don’t you think?)

This is the picture that came to my mind when I read Tozer’s statement: Dr. Seuss’ Grinch complaining about the Christmas noise down in Whoville, with drumsticks beating on his ears. The “noise” was the one thing he hated the most about the Who’s Christmas celebration.

Does our worship make God put holy, giant hands over holy, giant ears and scream “Oh the noise, noise, noise”? Don’t answer too quickly; read through Isaiah 58 first.

God seems to dislike worship that’s focused on us, “services” that reinforce our own prejudices and keeps us comfortable, seeking to avoid change, insulating us from the constant movement of God’s Spirit. “Here we are now– entertain us!” is not a response to God’s activity in the world and in our lives. “Here am I; send me” is.

God desires worship that celebrates and engages God, because that kind of worship opens our hearts for God to pour God’s own self into us. That kind of worship invites God into our whole lives, not just a few moments on Sunday mornings when we’d rather be fishing.

One of my dear friends back in Greencastle, when praying before worship with the praise team, always invites God to “sit back and enjoy.” Now that’s what I call a heart of worship!

Tomorrow: preparing ourselves for worship.

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.